
Beyond the question of captain: the crisis in English cricket
The resoundingly lacklustre (at best) of the England cricket team in the just finished three Test series against the West Indies has again raised the issue of the future of captain Joe Root. He has achieved just one victory in the last seventeen matches. Yet while it is an issue the crisis in English cricket and the changes needed go much deeper (and they wont be sorted by Sir Dave Brailsford).
At the end of February the London Socialist Historians seminar heard from Duncan Stone on his new book Different Class, cricket from below
His book on the history of English cricket will not be popular with the cricket Establishment. A discussion on Test Match Special seems unlikely, although there have now been some reviews in papers and journals.
Stone did a PhD at Huddersfield and is a keen cricketer. We are talking here about grassroots cricket not the County structures let alone England. Yet without the former the latter struggle as the recent Ashes series underlined, again.
The book looks at his early attempts to become a league cricketer in Surrey where, compared to the North of England, the cricket was organised on a relatively exclusive class focused basis. He looks at class discrimination in cricket from the bottom up and how this has to an extent, but only to an extent, changed over time. After all the majority of the current England red ball team attended public school as did the England Under-19 squad.
Of course this point reflects the reality that facilities to learn the skills of cricket for teenagers are often only to be found at public schools now, so attendance, as for example in the case of Joe Root, was a matter of necessity, rather than privilege. The disappearance of school playing fields and the lack of cricket played in State schools, as well as the decline of company cricket facilities in recent decades underlines the point.
Stone then rightly overlays this with the rise of cricket competitions and leagues played by ethnic minority cricketers. These are separate to the existing leagues again no doubt with discrimination being a key issue. Official efforts to integrate and promote players into the upper professional structures of English cricket, for example Chance to Shine, have perhaps been well intentioned but had relatively little impact. The recent revelations about Yorkshire cricket underline the point and one of the key reasons for it: racism.
Stone’s conclusion argues that the ECB which runs English and Welsh cricket cannot be reformed. It has to be replaced and a body with different assumptions about cricket brought into being. Here Stone sees the dominant, conservative, history of cricket as a key issue. The assumption cricket is about fair play and gentlemanly conduct reflects a game with origins in the ruling class. Cricket’s future lies with the grassroots, where it is played between equals and which school someone went to or club they belong to is not a relevant issue.
Stone’s book is an important historical intervention into an sporting debate that is touching on some of the key issues facing British society.
Recording of Duncan Stone speaking at a London Socialist Historians seminar on 28th February 2022










