
Kicking over the statues, Colston, Fallism & the politics of statues
Professor Dan Hicks has written an important piece on the statue of slaver Edward Colston, currently on display in the M-Shed Museum in Bristol.
He focuses, rightly in my view, on the issues of anti-racism and anti-colonialism and whether not the statue of Colston but its fall and how it fell could be a positive. As he argues simply preserving it somewhere as a statue has the reverse impact, a reminder that even when statues which symbolise racism and oppression fall, they still remain.
https://artreview.com/lets-keep-colston-falling/
This is part of a wider statues debate. Leave aside the Culture Wars posturings of Oliver Dowden and the self-styled ‘Commonsense’ Group of Tory MPs.
Gary Younge has argued in the Guardian that we’d better off without any statues as they are a very poor way of remembering and contextualising history. Eric Hobsbawm made the point in Fractured Times that from 1918 the Bolsheviks took down statues put up by the Tsarist regimes and replaced them with those of revolutionary heroes.
Indeed the general theme on the left for many years has been little or nothing to do with taking down statues of any sort but rather of putting up ones to mark figures like Sylvia Pankhurst and William Cuffay part of British history that has somehow been previously ‘overlooked’.
Despite Dowden’s much proclaimed desire to put up statues nothing of course is actually happening about either.










