Let’s make the 50th anniversary of Murdoch’s S*n in 2019 its last one
The tragic death of Caroline Flack has brought into the spotlight yet again the gutter journalism of the Sun
The paper published a large number of articles about Ms Flack which at best didn’t help matters and certainly weren’t designed to
I dont expect anyone reading this reads the S*n (I certainly dont) but 17th November 2019 marked the 50th anniversary of the first edition of the paper under Murdoch’s ownership. It had previously been the Labour backed Daily Herald until 1964 and then The Sun owned by IPC.
The S*n which is not normally known for paying any attention to history strangely noticed the anniversary and marked it over several editions
The Guardian in autumn 1969 published a report about the preparations for the new paper including an interview with the first Editor Larry Lamb.
The tabloid style was there from the start with the headline to the first Editorial being ‘Reach for the Sun’. The Guardian also noted that the paper had no specialist editors (Defence etc) and no Foreign Editor. In short Murdoch started as he meant to go on.
There were few job losses in London but the Manchester operation of the old Sun was shut with no jobs kept on. Murdoch was clearly already gearing up for Wapping in 1986
The Sun was sold by the owners of the Mirror, IPC and from the first issues of the Murdoch Sun the competition was on.
At that time, 50 years ago, both papers supported Labour and the new Sun carried an interview with Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson.
The tabloid style has lasted 5 decades, the political allegiance soon switched.
Surely this latest Sun related event after all the phone hacking and made up stories suggests that the 50th anniversary of the Murdoch paper should be its last. Circulation has been in decline and Murdoch’s UK media interest, post Sky ownership, appears to be the Times, the new Times Radio and taking on the BBC.
That also needs to be opposed but the Sun may not fit Murdoch’s business model much longer and it certainly doesn’t fit what a paper should be in a democracy.










