Articles

Beard Wearers for a Labour Victory launched

In Uncategorized on November 25, 2019 by kmflett

Beard Liberation Front

PRESS RELEASE 25th November

contact Keith Flett 07803 167266

BEARD WEARERS FOR A LABOUR VICTORY LAUNCHED

The Beard Liberation Front, the informal network of beard wearers, which campaigns against irrational prejudice against the hirsute, has said that it is today launching Beard Wearers for a Labour Victory.

It is hoping that despite media pogonophobia that on 13th December Britain will have, in Jeremy Corbyn, its first Prime Minister with a beard since the Tory PM Lord Salisbury in 1902.

Beard Wearers for a Labour Victory say that of the three Party Manifestos Labour’s is the only one that can be seen as Beard Friendly with its commitment to workplace equalities representatives.

It is hoped that over time with a hirsute Prime Minister in N0.10 Downing St that a Beard Equality Act to outlaw pogonophobia can be brought forward

BLF Organiser Keith Flett said let’s face it, Boris Johnson is never going to grow a beard he has enough trouble remembering to comb his hair, while the Liberal Democrats, if positively promoting diversity in political leadership have completely ditched their hirsute heritage. It is time for Britain to have a Prime Minister with a beard, the first for 117 years.

Beard Wearers for a Labour Victory will be supporting hirsute Labour candidates across the UK and in particular calling out instances of pogonophobic prejudice against them.

Articles

Socialist Historians back UCU University strike on pensions, pay and working conditions

In Uncategorized on November 25, 2019 by kmflett

London Socialist Historians Group

25th November

Contact Dr Keith Flett 07803 167266

Socialist Historians back UCU University strike on pensions, pay & working conditions

The London Socialist Historians Group which organises the socialist history seminar at the Institute of Historical Research at the University of London, Senate House (currently suspended due to the IWGB boycott) has said it fully supports the strike action and ‘work to rule’ which the University and College Union are taking at 60 Universities from Monday 25th November.

The strike action which involved two ballots one over pensions, the other on pay and working conditions will continue for 8 days until 4th December.

The historians say that the future of history teaching and historical research at Universities is being called into question as academics face ever more pressure in their working lives. The conditions for carefully prepared lectures and detailed research are being continually undermined in the neo-liberal University

LSHG Convenor Dr Keith Flett said, of course as socialist historians we have a duty of solidarity with any workers taking industrial action to defend and advance their working conditions. However when it comes to the UCU action it is very close to home. The question of how well history will be taught and researched in the academy in the next period is at stake here. We’re hoping for a successful UCU strike.

https://www.ucu.org.uk/article/10453/University-strikes-ON-after-universities-refuse-to-deal-with-pensions-pay-and-working-conditions?list=1676

 

Articles

Beard Liberation Front says Tory Manifesto speaks to the Britain of the 1950s

In Uncategorized on November 24, 2019 by kmflett

Beard Liberation Front

PRESS RELEASE 24th November

contact Keith Flett 07803 167266

BEARD LIBERATION FRONT SAYS TORY MANIFESTO SPEAKS TO THE BRITAIN OF THE 1950s

The Beard Liberation Front, the informal network of beard wearers, which campaigns against irrational prejudice against the hirsute, has said that the Conservative Party General Election Manifesto 2019 is an astonishing document apparently rooted in the Britain of the 1950s.

There is, perhaps predictably, no mention of beard equality, but in fact there is no substantive mention of the diverse society Britain now is in 2019 and the need to make sure that discrimination based on any aspect of someone’s appearance, beliefs or sexuality is included.

The campaigners say that the Manifesto has the feel of a document addressed to a load of old clean shaven white men, which while it may well accurately reflect the limited membership of the Tory Party is not Britain in 2019

BLF Organiser Keith Flett said the Tory Party Manifesto is not Beard Friendly. In fact it is not particularly friendly to human beings in general.

https://vote.conservatives.com/our-plan

Articles

The Ambridge Socialist: who will be Grundy World of Christmas Santa now?

In Uncategorized on November 24, 2019 by kmflett

The Ambridge Socialist

Reporting on the class struggle in Borsetshire

November 24th

Leonard in marriage threat to Archer dynasty

Leonard has told David that he thinks Jill wants him to propose marriage to her. This has sparked an immediate Archers crisis and David has sought advice from Elizabeth. After all if Leonard marries into the Dynasty, depending on events, he could gain power and influence which might dilute David’s own well known plans for world domination. For the moment however David is going along with it

The last of Joe Grundy’s cider

Alf has apparently left the building and Eddie and Co. have sampled the cider that was fermented the night that Joe Grundy died. Grundy’s Turkeys will still be a thing this Christmas but otherwise Eddie plans a contemplative year end, perhaps with plans to launch a craft cider operation in 2020

Grundy World of Christmas

After a review Eddie has decided that the Grundy World of Christmas will go ahead this year. There is however a significant issue to address. After the departure of Joe, who will be Santa?

Borchester Land Board see chance to make profit out of climate change

The Rewilding Ambridge project which won the Ambridge Conservation Trust funding recently needs to get land for the project by Xmas. Fortunately Justin is keen to get the BL Board to rent them some. The BL Board gets green credentials and makes money at the same time. Capitalism wins again.

In Other News

Phoebe’s land grab has failed for the moment but see above

Russ has been called in as advisor to the Lower Loxley Xmas Ghost project

Articles

Labour & European Referendums. From Wilson in 1975 to Corbyn in 2019

In Uncategorized on November 23, 2019 by kmflett

Labour & European Referendums. From Wilson in 1975 to Corbyn in 2019

In a BBC Election debate on 22nd November Jeremy Corbyn said he would remain neutral in a Referendum on the EU to be held if Labour win the Election.

Comparisons were made with the position taken by Harold Wilson in 1975.

After Britain joined the then EEC under a Tory Government and Labour won the February and October 1974 General Elections Labour support for a Referendum on Europe grew.

Labour had sought to renegotiate the Tory terms of entry to the EEC and Harold Wilson proclaimed himself satisfied with the outcome. He subsequently achieved a Cabinet and Commons majority to support them and Commons support for a Referendum to approve them.

A particular issue in the 1974/5 renegotiations was relations with the wider Commonwealth and trade with countries like New Zealand. Wilson claimed to have 44 relations in New Zealand and appears to have secured some kind of EEC opt out to allow New Zealand butter to continue to be imported to the UK on existing terms.

Strangely Harold Wilson’s view of Europe in 1975 mirrored in some important respects Jeremy Corbyn’s view in 2019

Wilson did not see himself as any great enthusiast for the EEC. But he regarded staying in it as a pragmatic thing to do in the circumstances.

Wilson backed remain after a renegotiation but did not campaign for it and allowed Cabinet Ministers to support either side. The similarity with Corbyn’s position in 2019 is quite striking

The circumstances were indeed important.

A miners strike in early 1972 had in effect caused the fall of the Heath Tory Government. Meanwhile the Six Day War had seen a significant rise in oil prices, an energy crisis and a spike in inflation. In the year to the 1975 Referendum prices had risen by 25% and price inflation in June 1975 was running at 50%.

The vote on Europe in 1975 was part of a wider debate about whether British capitalism could survive at all and if so how as it is now

The Referendum took place on Thursday 5th June 1975 and was about whether Britain should remain in what was then called the Common Market or EEC. The result was 2-1 in favour of being part of Europe.

Given the decisive nature of the result one might wonder why so much political heat was generated by the Referendum campaign and result.

In 1975 the Referendum was a constitutional innovation and it was one that had been promoted in particular by Tony Benn

While Tony Benn had championed the idea of a Referendum as a constitutional innovation to address the issue of Europe. Butler and Kitzinger identify Douglas Jay as the man who most persistently pushed the issue in the Labour Party. Benn had been pro-Europe when he raised the idea he was against by the time of the Referendum.

 

It was primarily those who wanted to come out of Europe who were keenest on a Referendum in 1975, not the case in 2019

There are not a huge range of sources for the 1975 Referendum. The key reference book is Butler and Kitzinger which is in the style of the volumes on UK General Elections. It focuses on the official campaigns with a particularly useful section on the media.

Those looking to understand what the extra-Parliamentary left had to say will need to look elsewhere. Tony Benn’s Diary for the period (strangely the only one not available electronically) provides a detailed account of events. Mrs Thatcher’s archive at the Thatcher Foundation by contrast disappoints. No personal papers from 1975 are apparently extant.

Of the extra-Parliamentary left campaign there is very little available on-line. It is obviously possible to check physical copies of the Socialist Worker and Morning Star in the British Library. Butler and Kitzinger do reproduce one poignant cartoon from the Star which shows two ‘no’ voters on Referendum day commenting that it was the first time they had had a chance to vote against all three main parties at the same time.

Tom Nairn had earlier surveyed the attitude of the British left to Europe as he saw it (New Left Review 1/75 1972)

The remain campaign was certainly much better financed and resourced in 1975 although whether it had as many activists on the ground as the leave campaign (National Referendum Campaign) is more arguable.

A key part of the NRC was the Labour Common Market Safeguards Campaign a long running organisation which had pushed for reform of the EEC. It had the support of a number of major unions, although those on the right such as USDAW, NUR, APEX and UPW backed remain.

A number of union officials and researchers were seconded to the campaign, including a young Hilary Benn who worked out of the Spectator’s Offices in Doughty St.

It is clear that the official labour movement played a much greater role in the 1975 campaign that was the case in 2016 and this reflected the political context of the times. Butler and Kitzinger note for example that the then Tribune newspaper was an important part of the campaign.

Tony Benn’s Diaries give probably the best flavour of the content of the 1975 campaign.

Butler and Kitzinger note that a poll showed the overwhelming majority of Tory voters were for ‘in’ in 1975 and aside from some sniping with the Liberals (newly elected leader Mrs Thatcher tried to stop Tories sharing platforms with Liberals, unsuccessfully. No doubt in mind was Liberal leader Jeremy Thorpe who even at this time was caught up in allegations about his private life which were to lead to his trial for murder in 1979) the Tories backed the ‘remain’ campaign.

The leading exception was of course Enoch Powell who by 1975 was in any case no longer officially a Tory.

Tony Benn wrote to Thatcher on 20th April 1975 asking her if the Tories would honour a ‘leave’ vote and although there is no record of an official response from the Tory leader the essential answer was that they would not as ultimately it was a matter for Parliament.

Benn put forward an economic strategy based on leaving Europe and argued his case in Cabinet meetings.

His ideas were very much in the same area as what was known as the alternative economic strategy.

In essence this was a version of autarky where Britain sought to control capital within its borders, meaning import controls and planned investment. This was also tied in with arguments around British sovereignty and the ability of Parliament to make its own decisions on economic and political matters without reference to Europe.

Given that capital was and is an international system its not clear this would have worked. Wilson however had the Cabinet majority. As noted he was no fan of Europe. Benn quotes him as saying ‘I am only persuaded 51% to 49%’ He was in favour of dealing with as best as could be managed. Benn’s Diary for 27th February 1975 notes Wilson in a Cabinet meeting saying ‘we have got to be practical’.

It’s doubtful this amounted to a plan but the impact in the 1974-79 Labour Government was cuts in public spending and job losses. Whether Benn’s ideas would have produced a better and different result is of course unknown.

However shortly after the defeat of the left in the Referendum campaign Harold Wilson implemented his Social Contract, in effect wage controls in a period of high inflation.

Be that as it may Benn and his ideas became a central focus of the 1975 campaign.

Benn had argued that there was ‘more of a danger’ posed by the European Commission than by ‘Mick McGahey or even the International Socialists’.

On 26th April Labour held a Special Conference on Europe at the Sobell Centre in Islington. Michael Foot made the concluding speech quoting Nye Bevan and Rainsborough and the ‘leave’ position won by 3.9m to 1.7m..

The following day former Tory leader Heath wrote in the Sunday Express ‘are you voting for a Communist takeover?’. He was referring to Tony Benn who certainly was not a Communist but this reflected the tone of media coverage.

In the final weeks of the campaign Benn became an increasing focus.

His diary for May 10th 1975 records him at Barnsley Civic Hall. A meeting of 1,000 NUM delegates chaired by Arthur Scargill heard Benn put the case against the Common Market. Benn noted that it was the first time he had heard Scargill speak.

The following day Sunday 11th May the Sunday Mirror ran an article by the hard-line right-wing former Labour MP Woodrow Wyatt ‘Bye, bye Benn’. This addressed media speculation that Wilson would sack Benn from the Cabinet after the Referendum result. Benn’s Diary notes that there were 8 press cars outside of his flat and that journalists had also taken a lease on a flat opposite to keep him under constant watch. Benn records complaining to the Daily Mail about harassment after persistent, completely false, stories that a member of his family was in hospital.

Benn was no happier with the BBC describing it on 14th May as a ‘hot bed of pro-Market people’. He notes receiving death threats and met with Special Branch about these. They felt that murder was unlikely but ‘there may be a risk of you getting biffed’.

In the final days of the 1975 campaign the focus was on whether leaving or staying in Europe would have more impact on jobs. At the beginning of the week of the poll Benn debated with Roy Jenkins on Panorama. The following day he was at a meeting in Cardiff organised by Neil Kinnock to campaign for a ‘no’ vote. Speakers included Michael Foot (a Welsh Labour MP) and Welsh NUM leader Dai Francis. 2000 people attended.

The vote on 5th June 1975 was 17m in favour of remaining in Europe and 8.5m in favour of leaving. This represented a 67.5% ‘in’ vote on a 65% poll.

Benn records speaking to Enoch Powell at the party after the polls had closed and finding him arguing that the process of disengaging from Europe had only just begun.

The wider and longer term implications of the events of the 1975 Referendum campaign now started to make themselves felt.

These included Harold Wilson’s social contract (in effect wage cuts in a period of high inflation), Wilson’s own resignation and the IMF imposed austerity cuts in public spending.

My thanks to Ian Birchall for comments though the responsibility for the text remains entirely mine.

An earlier version of this post was given as a paper at the Institute of Historical Research, University of London on June 6th 2016

Articles

Jeremy Corbyn set to fight to retain Parliamentary Beard of the Year Award

In Uncategorized on November 23, 2019 by kmflett

Beard Liberation Front

Media Release

23rd November

Contact: Keith Flett 07803 167266

Jeremy Corbyn set to fight to retain Parliamentary Beard of the Year Award

The Beard Liberation Front the informal network of beard wearers has announced the 2019 Parliamentary Beard of the Year shortlist

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has won the Award 8 times in total in 2001, 2007, 2011, 2012 (shared), 2014, 2015 and 2016. He was declared not eligible in 2017 to give newer Parliamentary beards a chance but won again in 2018

The Award is not about the politics of the beard wearer but about how well they have deployed their beard in public during the year, particularly in Parliament.

BLF Organiser Keith Flett said, we welcome the growth of beards in Parliament as the policy of ‘no cuts’ continues to gain popularity. A key issue this year is whether Jeremy Corbyn still has the beard power to shave opponents.

The vote is open now and will close at midday on 5th December with the winner announced ahead of the General Election on 6th December

Parliamentary Beard of the Year 2019 shortlist

Chris Elmore (Labour)

Lord Tony Greaves (LIbDem)

Lord Hylton (Crossbencher)

Jim McMahon (Labour)

Nadhim Zahawi (Tory)

Ben Bradley (Tory)

Barry Gardiner (Labour)

Stephen Kinnock (Labour)

Alex Cunningham (Labour)

Stephen Crabb (Tory)

Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)

Andy McDonald (Labour)

Crispin Blunt (Tory)

Andrew Gwynne (Labour)

Lloyd Russell-Moyle (Labour)

 

 

 

Recent winners

2011 Jeremy Corbyn

2012 Jeremy Corbyn/John Randall

2013 Julian Huppert

2014 Jeremy Corbyn

2015 Jeremy Corbyn

2016 Jeremy Corbyn

2017 Ben Bradley

2018 Jeremy Corbyn

Articles

Peter Finnerty, Peterloo, Samuel Bamford and Ramsay MacDonald

In Uncategorized on November 22, 2019 by kmflett

Peter Finnerty, Peterloo, Samuel Bamford & Ramsay MacDonald

Peter Finnerty was a supporter of the United Irishmen at the end of the eighteenth century, a veteran opponent of Castlereagh who was Home Secretary at the time of Peterloo in 1819 and a Parliamentary reporter for the Whig (Liberal) daily paper the Morning Chronicle.

I’m pleased to note that a long overdue biography of Finnerty is in hand. He was a significant figure in early nineteenth century radical politics, an associate of both Sir Francis Burdett and William Hazlett and an important link between English and Irish radical politics.

Finnerty was imprisoned in Lincoln jail in 1812 for libelling Castlereagh and a youthful Shelley wrote a poem in his defence. Shelley also wrote or course the Masque of Anarchy about Peterloo although it was not published until some years after the massacre.

I’ve been looking at what Finnerty’s links were with Peterloo.

I don’t think he was in Manchester on that August Monday in 1819. Certainly the editions of the Morning Chronicle published in the days after the Massacre did not suggest they had a reporter present.

He was however present at the inquest into the death of a man killed at Peterloo in September 1819,John Lees, and it was there he met Samuel Bamford, the leader of the Middleton contingent on 16th August 1819. Finnerty had been one of a handful who had inspected John Lees body before the inquest began but was barred from attending by the Coroner.

He successfully lobbied Bamford for his notes so he could publish details in the Morning Chronicle.

This led him to suggest Bamford could get a job on the paper.

The story of this episode is here:

https://minorvictorianwriters.org.uk/bamford/c_radical_(9).htm

As Finnerty and Bamford travelled to London he stopped at the house of Sir Richard Wolseley.

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wolseley,_Charles_(1769-1846)_(DNB00)

Wolesley had chaired one of the great meetings that was a precursor to Peterloo and had been in jail on 16th August 1819. However on release he showed an interest in the fate of those injured and killed.

This no doubt explains why Finnerty who clearly knew him stopped by his residence.

What we don’t know is whether Finnerty was also involved in pre-Peterloo agitation as Wolseley had been.

In an interesting twist the Dictionary of National Biography entry on Wolseley above was written by Ramsay MacDonald.

Research work still in progress.

 

 

 

 

 

Articles

What really happened in Britain in the 1970s

In Uncategorized on November 22, 2019 by kmflett

What really happened in Britain in the 1970s

In 1973 there was a military coup against a democratically elected left-wing Government in Chile.

It was a bloody and vicious affair (on the part of the army and its US backers)but is probably not the preferred instrument of the ruling order for regime change or perhaps more accurately regime changes.

Sometimes they are people who have to go or be moved to keep the ‘markets’ happy. It happened to Tony Benn in 1975 and to Varoufakis in Greece in 2015, although he chose to leave the Government rather than accept a lesser role.

But more often it’s about policy changes.

What it meant for the UK in 1976 is largely a matter of historical record and memoirs now.

The 1974 oil crisis had caused serious problems for the UK economy and the Labour Government which was elected twice in that year on a platform well to the left of where Labour currently is (but still on the basis of managing the system and reforming it where possible) faced economic problems.

Towards the end of 1976 the Prime Minister Jim Callaghan claimed that the country had only £2 billion left and that measures from printing money to increased unemployment and cuts in benefits would be required unless action was taken.

Benn records in his Diaries that Michael Foot spoke against £2bn cuts in spending, increased unemployment and cuts in benefits on the basis that these were unsustainable and would split both the trade unions and the Labour Party.

The choice remained between a left-wing strategy of no cuts and economic investment championed by Tony Benn and others and a loan from the IMF.

The choice does seem familiar.

Tony Benn argued that the situation was similar to 1931 when Labour split over austerity measures. Callaghan disagreed.

Benn’s alternative strategy which involved import controls, reduction in armed forces commitment in Cyprus and Germany and withdrawal from what was then the EEC was part of an alternative left strategy.

It might be queried how effective at least parts of it would have been.

Denis Healey’s policy of monetarism certainly was effective. Its main effect was to usher in the Thatcherite era of neo-liberal economics which New Labour in key parts (but not quite all) kept to.

The Labour left made their point but did not resign. It can be argued that to have done so would simply have given an earlier start to Thatcherism.

The real alternative of mobilising protest from below in workplaces and communities was not centrally addressed- although obviously there were anti-cuts protests and campaigns.

Even so the events of 1976 are a reminder of the origins of austerity politics and the opposition to them. The search for a successful strategy to counter them continues. Perhaps the 2019 Labour Manifesto in part constructed by people who do remember the actual 1970s may do something.

Not name calling but serious politics are required to beat those who would make ordinary people pay for their crisis.

 

 

Articles

Strictly It Takes Two star Rylan faces Jeremy Corbyn for Beard of the Year vote

In Uncategorized on November 22, 2019 by kmflett

Beard Liberation Front

21st November

contact Keith Flett 07803 167266

Strictly It Takes Two star Rylan faces Jeremy Corbyn for Beard of the Year vote

The Beard Liberation Front, the informal network of beard wearers, has said that the process of determining the Beard of the Year 2019 is in its final stage as the shortlist for the coveted Award is published

The on-line poll to determine the winner is now open and will close on December 24th

The winner is announced on December 28th.

This year for the first time the position taken in the list for the final vote has been determined by the order in which the finalists finished in a pre-poll.

The criteria for Beard of the Year is as follows:

The Award is NOT about people who grow beards in their bedrooms and post pictures of them on the internet

The Award IS about people with consistent beards in the public eye who promote a positive image of the hirsute

TV doctor Xand Van Tulleken and cosmologist Peter Coles currently at Maynooth University in Ireland shared the Award in 2018.

BLF Organiser Keith Flett said, Rylan Clark-Neal facing off against Jeremy Corbyn suggests an unpredictable outcome but not so long ago Tom Jones and the Archbishop of Canterbury tied for the Award so we’ve come to expect interesting juxtapositions

Beard of the Year 2019 shortlist

Rylan Clark-Neal

Ben Bellamy

Jeremy Corbyn

Alexei Sayle

Mauricio Pochettino

Billy Connolly

Ben Stokes

Jurgen Klopp

Bob Harris

Stig Abell

Michael Rosen

Idris Elba

Billy Bragg

George Clooney

Articles

Tim Martin waives the rules but gets investor backing at Wetherspoons AGM

In Uncategorized on November 21, 2019 by kmflett

Tim Martin has got investor backing to waive the rules at the Wetherspoons AGM despite press speculation that some institutional investors (i.e those who own much of the Company aside from Martin himself who has 32% of shares, more than enough to give him day to day control) were unhappy about his political activities and a failure to keep them firmly apart from Wetherspoons business.

The FT report is here:

https://www.ft.com/content/694b07f2-0c81-11ea-b2d6-9bf4d1957a67

One wouldnt normally expect small investors (who would be the bulk of attenders at an AGM on the day) to vote against Martin or in most cases probably be bothered about his politics.

The FT report hints that Martin has done some kind of deal with the institutional investors but whether this will make him shut up or even make an effort to keep his personal opinions out of his pubs we shall see.

In the meantime no doubt the efforts of the Bakers Union to get Wetherspoons to pay decent wages will continue. This should concern the institutional investors not least because it is reputational but it doesnt appear to have done.